Celestial Hierarchy IX 10, 11, commentary on (DS10144) (Q44534): Difference between revisions

From DS 2.0 Catalog
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(‎Created a new Item)
 
(‎Changed claim: title as recorded (P10): Celestial Hierarchy IX 10, 11, commentary on)
 
Property / title as recorded: Celestial Hierarchy IX 10, 11, commentary on / qualifier
 
Property / title as recorded: Celestial Hierarchy IX 10, 11, commentary on / qualifier
 

Latest revision as of 13:56, 19 August 2024

Manuscript metadata collected by Digital Scriptorium from University of Missouri (Fragmenta Manuscripta 071, Fragmenta Manuscripta 071)
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Celestial Hierarchy IX 10, 11, commentary on (DS10144)
Manuscript metadata collected by Digital Scriptorium from University of Missouri (Fragmenta Manuscripta 071, Fragmenta Manuscripta 071)

    Statements

    Celestial Hierarchy IX 10, 11, commentary on
    0 references
    John Bagford (1650s-1716) to St. Martin-in-the-Fields; sale 1861 to Sir Thomas Phillipps, n.15758; his sale 22 May, 1913, lot 742; Sir Sydney Cockerell (1867-1962) sale Sotheby's 3 April, 1957; William Salloch (Ossining NY) Cat. 258 (1968) to U. Missouri.
    0 references
    0 references
    s. XII(ex); 1185-1199
    0 references
    0 references
    Binding: Not bound.
    0 references
    Other decoration, f. 1r-v: Decorated "C" (8 lines tall).
    0 references
    Number of scribes, f. 1r-v: 1.
    0 references
    Script, f. 1r-v: Transitional script.
    0 references
    Layout, f. 1r-v: One column visible with 31 visible lines, with bounding lines, recto and verso ruled separately with leadpoint.
    0 references
    Manuscript note: Companion to Frag. Man. 026, recto of fragment was original verso of codex.
    0 references
    Bibliography: M. McC. Gatch, "Fragmenta Manuscripta and Varia at Missouri and Cambridge," Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society9 (1990) 434-75.
    0 references
    f. 1r-v: Companion to Fragmenta Manuscripta 026;note that what is catalogued as the recto of the fragment was the verso in the original codex.
    0 references
    f. 1r-v: Latin.
    0 references
    f. 1r-v: Companion to Frag. Man. 026, recto of fragment was original verso of codex.
    0 references
    23 July 2024
    0 references
    23 July 2024
    0 references