Celestial Hierarchy IX 10, 11, commentary on (DS10144) (Q44534): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DigScrAdmin (talk | contribs) (Created a new Item) |
(Changed claim: title as recorded (P10): Celestial Hierarchy IX 10, 11, commentary on) |
||
| Property / title as recorded: Celestial Hierarchy IX 10, 11, commentary on / qualifier | |||
| Property / title as recorded: Celestial Hierarchy IX 10, 11, commentary on / qualifier | |||
Latest revision as of 13:56, 19 August 2024
Manuscript metadata collected by Digital Scriptorium from University of Missouri (Fragmenta Manuscripta 071, Fragmenta Manuscripta 071)
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Celestial Hierarchy IX 10, 11, commentary on (DS10144) |
Manuscript metadata collected by Digital Scriptorium from University of Missouri (Fragmenta Manuscripta 071, Fragmenta Manuscripta 071) |
Statements
Hugh of St. Victor
0 references
John Bagford (1650s-1716) to St. Martin-in-the-Fields; sale 1861 to Sir Thomas Phillipps, n.15758; his sale 22 May, 1913, lot 742; Sir Sydney Cockerell (1867-1962) sale Sotheby's 3 April, 1957; William Salloch (Ossining NY) Cat. 258 (1968) to U. Missouri.
0 references
Dionysius the Areopagite
0 references
s. XII(ex); 1185-1199
12. century
1185Gregorian
1199Gregorian
0 references
Binding: Not bound.
0 references
Other decoration, f. 1r-v: Decorated "C" (8 lines tall).
0 references
Number of scribes, f. 1r-v: 1.
0 references
Script, f. 1r-v: Transitional script.
0 references
Layout, f. 1r-v: One column visible with 31 visible lines, with bounding lines, recto and verso ruled separately with leadpoint.
0 references
Manuscript note: Companion to Frag. Man. 026, recto of fragment was original verso of codex.
0 references
Bibliography: M. McC. Gatch, "Fragmenta Manuscripta and Varia at Missouri and Cambridge," Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society9 (1990) 434-75.
0 references
f. 1r-v: Companion to Fragmenta Manuscripta 026;note that what is catalogued as the recto of the fragment was the verso in the original codex.
0 references
f. 1r-v: Latin.
0 references
f. 1r-v: Companion to Frag. Man. 026, recto of fragment was original verso of codex.
0 references
23 July 2024
0 references
23 July 2024
0 references